Penetration Testing vs. Red Teaming—What’s the Difference?
Author: Matt Hulse
Penetration Testing and Red Teaming are two critical aspects of cybersecurity testing. Although they might seem similar, they serve different purposes and therefore require unique approaches. This article dives into these distinctions, providing insights to help you incorporate both strategies into your organization’s cybersecurity testing program.
The need for cybersecurity testing services like Penetration Tests and Red Teaming is on the rise. Initially valued at $1.62 billion in 2021, the global Penetration Testing market is expected to grow at a CAGR of 13.9% over the next seven years, eventually reaching $4.84 billion by 2030. There are multiple factors driving this trend, including an uptick in ransomware attacks; the ever-shifting regulatory landscape; and the rising popularity of IoT, smartphone adoption, and cloud-based services.
What Are Penetration Testing and Red Teaming?
By contrast, Red Teaming takes a broader perspective. While Penetration Testing focuses on breaking into specific systems, Red Teaming simulates a full-spectrum attack on your organization. It’s a realistic stress test that considers the human factor, organizational behaviors, physical security, and more. Red Teamers look at potential business impact rather than merely breaching the system.
4 Key Differences Between Penetration Testing and Red Teaming